Reviewing Your Hiring Strategy

A Thorough Review of Your Hiring Strategy: Key Steps and Considerations

Most leaders agree that the quality of their people is the most important thing to ensure their business flourishes. For this reason, finding and retaining top talent is often a priority for every business.


A well-thought-out hiring strategy is crucial for long term success.  But like any other business process, your hiring strategy should not be set in stone. Regularly reviewing and fine-tuning it is essential to adapt to changing market dynamics, technology advancements, and the evolving needs of your organisation. In this blog, we will explore the importance of reviewing your hiring strategy and outline key steps and considerations to ensure you are on the right track.


Why Review Your Hiring Strategy?


Adapt to Market Changes: The job market is constantly evolving, influenced by economic conditions, industry trends, and technological advancements. Your hiring strategy must remain agile to respond to these changes effectively.


Improve Quality of Hires: A periodic review allows you to assess the quality of candidates you've been hiring. It helps identify patterns, whether positive or negative, in your recruitment efforts and make necessary adjustments to improve the overall quality of hires.


Enhance Diversity and Inclusion: Diversity is not just a buzzword; it's a business imperative. A hiring strategy review can help ensure that you are actively promoting diversity and inclusion in your workforce.


Boost Efficiency: Regularly evaluating your hiring process can uncover bottlenecks, redundancies, or inefficiencies that might be costing you time and money. Streamlining your process can lead to significant improvements in efficiency.


Steps to Review Your Hiring Strategy:


Gather Data: Start by collecting and analysing relevant data. This includes metrics such as time-to-fill, cost-per-hire, turnover rates, and candidate feedback. Review past recruitment efforts to identify what worked and what didn't.


Set Clear Objectives: Determine what you want to achieve with your hiring strategy. Are you looking to reduce time-to-fill, improve candidate experience, or increase diversity? Setting clear objectives will guide your review process.


Assess Your Employer Brand: Your employer brand plays a crucial role in attracting top talent. Evaluate how your organisation is perceived in the job market and make necessary improvements to enhance your brand.


Review Sourcing Channels: Examine the channels you use to source candidates. Are job boards, social media, employee referrals, or recruitment agencies providing the desired results? Adjust your sourcing mix as needed.


Evaluate the Interview Process: Assess your interview process for effectiveness and consistency. Are you using competency-based interviews, behavioral assessments, or other methods? Ensure that your interviews are aligned with your hiring objectives.


Diversity and Inclusion: Review your diversity and inclusion efforts. Are you attracting a diverse pool of candidates, and do you have inclusive practices in place? Make adjustments to eliminate biases and promote inclusivity.


Candidate Experience: Pay attention to the candidate experience from application to onboarding. Gather feedback from candidates to identify areas for improvement and implement changes accordingly.


Training and Development: Evaluate the training and development programs for your hiring team. Are they up-to-date with best practices? Investing in ongoing training can significantly enhance your hiring team's capabilities.


Continuous Improvement: Remember that the review process should be ongoing. Set regular intervals for revisiting your hiring strategy, making adjustments, and measuring the impact of those changes.


Conclusion


Reviewing your hiring strategy is not just a one-time event but an ongoing process that requires commitment and flexibility. By regularly evaluating and fine-tuning your approach, you can adapt to market changes, attract top talent, improve efficiency, and create a diverse and inclusive workforce.


Remember, a well-executed hiring strategy is not just about filling positions; it's about building a strong and dynamic team that can drive ongoing success.


By Eliot Acton January 28, 2026
There is a lot of confidence right now in finance. AI will fix reporting. AI will speed up forecasting. AI will improve insight. AI will free finance teams up to be more strategic. Some of that will be true. But there is an uncomfortable truth that rarely gets discussed. Most finance teams are not ready for AI. And AI is not the reason why. The illusion many finance leaders are buying into AI has become a convenient shortcut. A way to believe that technology will solve problems that are actually rooted in people, structure and decision making. If the tools are smart enough, the thinking will improve. If the dashboards are better, decisions will follow. If the output is faster, the function will become more strategic. That logic sounds attractive. It is also flawed. AI does not fix weak judgement. It does not fix unclear ownership. It does not fix poor challenge. It does not fix a finance team that lacks confidence or commercial understanding. It simply accelerates whatever already exists. Why AI exposes finance weaknesses rather than solving them In many organisations, finance already produces more information than the business can properly use. More reports have not led to better decisions. More data has not led to clearer strategy. More analysis has not led to better outcomes. AI increases volume, speed and sophistication. But it does not tell you: Which numbers actually matter What trade offs to make When to challenge a decision When to say no Those are human responsibilities. If a finance team struggles to influence decisions today, AI will not suddenly give it a stronger voice tomorrow. The real risk leaders are ignoring The real risk is not that AI replaces finance professionals. The real risk is that it exposes which finance roles never moved beyond production in the first place. As automation removes transactional work, the remaining roles become more exposed. They require: Judgement Commercial awareness Confidence Influence Accountability for decisions Some people step into that space naturally. Others retreat from it. AI does not create that divide. It reveals it. Where most organisations are getting this wrong Many businesses are investing heavily in tools while changing very little about: How finance roles are defined What finance people are hired for How performance is measured Where decision ownership sits So finance teams are asked to be more strategic without being hired, structured or rewarded to do so. That is not transformation. It is expectation inflation. Why hiring matters more than technology right now Two organisations can implement the same AI tools. One gets better decisions. The other gets faster confusion. The difference is not software. It is capability. The businesses seeing real value from AI are: Hiring people who can interpret and challenge outputs Building finance roles around decisions, not reports Developing commercial confidence, not just technical depth Being honest about who can step up and who cannot They understand that AI raises the bar. It does not lower it. The conversation finance leaders need to have The most important AI question for finance is not: What tools should we buy? It is: Do we have the people who can actually use this well?  Because AI does not replace weak finance functions. It makes their weaknesses impossible to hide. And for leaders willing to face that honestly, that is not a threat. It is an opportunity.
By Eliot Acton January 27, 2026
Most finance transformations do not fail because of systems
By Eliot Acton January 27, 2026
Speed has become a badge of honour in recruitment