Understanding the Exodus: Why Do People Leave Their Jobs

Happiness Is Key

While it may not come as a surprise to most, the underlying reasons behind why people leave their jobs can often be complex and multifaceted. This list is by no means exhaustive but it does cover the majority of the most common reasons we discuss with candidates on a weekly basis.


Lack of Career Growth Opportunities:


One of the primary motivators for job changes is the desire for career advancement. When employees feel their current roles offer limited growth prospects, they often seek new opportunities elsewhere. Organisations that prioritise their employee development and provide clear pathways for advancement can significantly reduce turnover in this category.


Inadequate Compensation:


Money matters, and when employees believe they are not being compensated fairly for their contributions, they may decide to explore other job options. Competitive compensation packages are essential to attract and retain top talent.


Poor Work-Life Balance:


The elusive work-life balance has become a defining factor in job satisfaction. Long working hours, excessive demands, and a lack of flexibility can cause burnout and dissatisfaction, prompting employees to look for positions that offer a more harmonious work-life equilibrium.


Unhealthy Work Environment:


A toxic work environment, characterised by excessive stress, harassment, or a lack of support, can drive employees to leave. A healthy workplace culture that prioritises employee well-being and inclusivity is crucial in retaining talent.


Misalignment with Company Values:


When an individual's personal values do not align with the company's mission, vision, or culture, it can create a sense of disconnection and lead to job dissatisfaction. People often seek work that is more in sync with their beliefs and principles.


Lack of Recognition and Appreciation:


Feeling undervalued or unappreciated for their efforts can be demoralising for employees. Acknowledgement and appreciation for hard work and contributions are vital for morale and retention.


Better Opportunities Elsewhere:


The world is a very closely connected place these days. Employees are often aware of what is going on in the market and receive offers with more attractive benefits, higher pay, or better growth prospects from other companies on a regular basis. Such external offers can be a strong temptation, leading employees to consider a job change.


Stagnation and Boredom:


Monotony and a lack of challenging or engaging tasks can be a compelling reason for employees to explore new horizons. Providing opportunities for skill development and job enrichment can help retain individuals seeking intellectual stimulation.


Health and Personal Reasons:


Personal life changes, health issues, or family obligations may necessitate job changes. These are often unavoidable circumstances, but supportive employers can make a significant difference in such situations.

 

Inadequate Leadership and Management:


A significant percentage of employees leave their jobs due to conflicts with their immediate supervisors. Effective leadership, open communication, and transparent management are essential for retaining employees.


To simplify things, leaving a role is often because there is an element of unhappiness. It doesn’t have to be every aspect of the role that is causing this, but ultimately people want to be happy in their work and life and if there are elements they feel that are impacting this, the thought of a change is a natural one. This doesn’t mean it is the right solution but because of the number of moving parts involved, there is a high chance that not everything can be perfect all the time.   


The decision to leave a job is a complex one influenced by a combination of personal, professional, and organisational factors. To reduce employee turnover, organisations must actively address these issues, fostering a workplace culture that values employee growth, well-being, and satisfaction. Remember that each individual is unique, and understanding the diverse reasons behind job departures is crucial for creating a resilient and loyal workforce.


By Eliot Acton January 28, 2026
There is a lot of confidence right now in finance. AI will fix reporting. AI will speed up forecasting. AI will improve insight. AI will free finance teams up to be more strategic. Some of that will be true. But there is an uncomfortable truth that rarely gets discussed. Most finance teams are not ready for AI. And AI is not the reason why. The illusion many finance leaders are buying into AI has become a convenient shortcut. A way to believe that technology will solve problems that are actually rooted in people, structure and decision making. If the tools are smart enough, the thinking will improve. If the dashboards are better, decisions will follow. If the output is faster, the function will become more strategic. That logic sounds attractive. It is also flawed. AI does not fix weak judgement. It does not fix unclear ownership. It does not fix poor challenge. It does not fix a finance team that lacks confidence or commercial understanding. It simply accelerates whatever already exists. Why AI exposes finance weaknesses rather than solving them In many organisations, finance already produces more information than the business can properly use. More reports have not led to better decisions. More data has not led to clearer strategy. More analysis has not led to better outcomes. AI increases volume, speed and sophistication. But it does not tell you: Which numbers actually matter What trade offs to make When to challenge a decision When to say no Those are human responsibilities. If a finance team struggles to influence decisions today, AI will not suddenly give it a stronger voice tomorrow. The real risk leaders are ignoring The real risk is not that AI replaces finance professionals. The real risk is that it exposes which finance roles never moved beyond production in the first place. As automation removes transactional work, the remaining roles become more exposed. They require: Judgement Commercial awareness Confidence Influence Accountability for decisions Some people step into that space naturally. Others retreat from it. AI does not create that divide. It reveals it. Where most organisations are getting this wrong Many businesses are investing heavily in tools while changing very little about: How finance roles are defined What finance people are hired for How performance is measured Where decision ownership sits So finance teams are asked to be more strategic without being hired, structured or rewarded to do so. That is not transformation. It is expectation inflation. Why hiring matters more than technology right now Two organisations can implement the same AI tools. One gets better decisions. The other gets faster confusion. The difference is not software. It is capability. The businesses seeing real value from AI are: Hiring people who can interpret and challenge outputs Building finance roles around decisions, not reports Developing commercial confidence, not just technical depth Being honest about who can step up and who cannot They understand that AI raises the bar. It does not lower it. The conversation finance leaders need to have The most important AI question for finance is not: What tools should we buy? It is: Do we have the people who can actually use this well?  Because AI does not replace weak finance functions. It makes their weaknesses impossible to hide. And for leaders willing to face that honestly, that is not a threat. It is an opportunity.
By Eliot Acton January 27, 2026
Most finance transformations do not fail because of systems
By Eliot Acton January 27, 2026
Speed has become a badge of honour in recruitment