Mitigating Affinity Bias in Hiring: Cultivating Diversity and Inclusion in the Workplace

Building a more equitable future

Fostering diversity and inclusion shouldn't just be a buzzword or nice have company policy — it's a fundamental aspect of creating a robust, innovative, and thriving work environment. However, despite concerted efforts to prioritise diversity, bias, especially affinity bias, continues to permeate the hiring process, inadvertently impeding the goal of building diverse teams.


Affinity bias, a form of unconscious bias, occurs when hiring decisions are influenced by a candidate's similarity to the interviewer in terms of background, experiences, or interests. While it's natural for individuals to connect with those who share similarities, this bias can inadvertently perpetuate homogeneity in the workplace, limiting the potential for fresh perspectives and diverse ideas.


Here are a few strategies to mitigate affinity bias in the hiring process:


  1. Structured Interview Processes: Implement structured interviews that focus on skills, experiences, and competencies required for the job. By standardising questions and evaluation criteria, it becomes easier to assess candidates objectively based on job-related factors rather than personal connections.
  2. Diverse Interview Panels: Creating interview panels that represent a variety of backgrounds and perspectives can counteract the influence of affinity bias. Diverse panels offer different viewpoints and reduce the chances of biased decision-making.
  3. Blind Recruitment Practices: Utilise blind recruitment techniques such as removing names, ages, and other personally identifiable information from initial application reviews. This helps focus solely on a candidate’s qualifications and skills, rather than being swayed by unconscious biases.
  4. Training and Awareness: Conduct regular training sessions to increase awareness of unconscious bias among hiring managers and interviewers. Understanding and acknowledging these biases can empower individuals to consciously counteract them during the decision-making process.
  5. Data-Driven Decision Making: Use data and analytics to evaluate hiring decisions, track demographics, and measure the effectiveness of diversity initiatives. This data-driven approach can reveal patterns of bias and highlight areas that require attention.
  6. Culture of Inclusivity: Foster a company culture that celebrates diversity and inclusion. Encouraging open discussions and actively seeking diverse perspectives can help mitigate bias and create an environment where every individual feels valued and respected.


It's essential to recognise that eradicating affinity bias is an ongoing journey rather than a one-time fix. By continually evaluating and refining the hiring process, organisations can move towards a more inclusive and equitable workplace, where every individual has an equal opportunity to contribute and succeed.


Addressing affinity bias in the hiring process isn’t just a moral imperative — it's also a strategic advantage. Embracing diversity leads to richer ideas, better problem-solving, and increased innovation. By intentionally mitigating bias, we can build stronger, more dynamic teams that reflect the multifaceted world in which we live. It's a commitment to fairness, progress, and the collective growth of both individuals and organisations.


Let’s challenge bias, embrace diversity, and create workplaces that truly represent and celebrate the world we live in. Together, we can build a more equitable future.

By Eliot Acton January 28, 2026
There is a lot of confidence right now in finance. AI will fix reporting. AI will speed up forecasting. AI will improve insight. AI will free finance teams up to be more strategic. Some of that will be true. But there is an uncomfortable truth that rarely gets discussed. Most finance teams are not ready for AI. And AI is not the reason why. The illusion many finance leaders are buying into AI has become a convenient shortcut. A way to believe that technology will solve problems that are actually rooted in people, structure and decision making. If the tools are smart enough, the thinking will improve. If the dashboards are better, decisions will follow. If the output is faster, the function will become more strategic. That logic sounds attractive. It is also flawed. AI does not fix weak judgement. It does not fix unclear ownership. It does not fix poor challenge. It does not fix a finance team that lacks confidence or commercial understanding. It simply accelerates whatever already exists. Why AI exposes finance weaknesses rather than solving them In many organisations, finance already produces more information than the business can properly use. More reports have not led to better decisions. More data has not led to clearer strategy. More analysis has not led to better outcomes. AI increases volume, speed and sophistication. But it does not tell you: Which numbers actually matter What trade offs to make When to challenge a decision When to say no Those are human responsibilities. If a finance team struggles to influence decisions today, AI will not suddenly give it a stronger voice tomorrow. The real risk leaders are ignoring The real risk is not that AI replaces finance professionals. The real risk is that it exposes which finance roles never moved beyond production in the first place. As automation removes transactional work, the remaining roles become more exposed. They require: Judgement Commercial awareness Confidence Influence Accountability for decisions Some people step into that space naturally. Others retreat from it. AI does not create that divide. It reveals it. Where most organisations are getting this wrong Many businesses are investing heavily in tools while changing very little about: How finance roles are defined What finance people are hired for How performance is measured Where decision ownership sits So finance teams are asked to be more strategic without being hired, structured or rewarded to do so. That is not transformation. It is expectation inflation. Why hiring matters more than technology right now Two organisations can implement the same AI tools. One gets better decisions. The other gets faster confusion. The difference is not software. It is capability. The businesses seeing real value from AI are: Hiring people who can interpret and challenge outputs Building finance roles around decisions, not reports Developing commercial confidence, not just technical depth Being honest about who can step up and who cannot They understand that AI raises the bar. It does not lower it. The conversation finance leaders need to have The most important AI question for finance is not: What tools should we buy? It is: Do we have the people who can actually use this well?  Because AI does not replace weak finance functions. It makes their weaknesses impossible to hide. And for leaders willing to face that honestly, that is not a threat. It is an opportunity.
By Eliot Acton January 27, 2026
Most finance transformations do not fail because of systems
By Eliot Acton January 27, 2026
Speed has become a badge of honour in recruitment