Is the CV Outdated? Rethinking How We Showcase Talent in the Digital Age

For decades, the CV has been a staple of job applications—a straightforward document that lists education, experience, and skills to introduce candidates to potential employers. But as the world of work evolves, we have to ask: in an era of digital profiles, instant connectivity, and rapidly changing skills, is the traditional CV still the best way to showcase talent?


In this post, we’ll examine why the CV might be outdated and explore new ways candidates and recruiters are moving forward.


1. The Limitations of a Static Document

One of the CV's main limitations is that it’s static. A CV is a snapshot of the past, listing achievements that may not fully reflect a candidate’s current abilities or future potential. In fields like finance and tech, where skills can become obsolete quickly, a static document fails to capture the evolving nature of a professional's journey.

Today, many recruiters are looking for interactive ways to assess candidates’ skills. Platforms like GitHub (for developers), Behance (for creatives), and LinkedIn allow candidates to continuously update their profiles with projects, certifications, and endorsements that showcase their progress over time.


2. CVs Overlook Soft Skills and Personality

In finance and many other fields, technical abilities alone aren’t enough—qualities like adaptability, teamwork, and communication are also essential. However, these “soft skills” are often hard to convey through a CV. Even well-crafted descriptions or bullet points can’t provide the same insight as a work portfolio, video introduction, or behavioural assessment.

Video CVs, work samples, and even personality assessments are starting to fill this gap, giving hiring managers a chance to assess candidates' personality and communication skills before the first interview. For instance, some recruiters ask candidates to submit short video introductions or complete assessments to get a more well-rounded view of the person behind the CV.


3. The Rise of Online Portfolios and Personal Branding

Today, many professionals maintain an online presence across platforms like LinkedIn, Medium, or personal websites. These profiles are often more comprehensive and up-to-date than a CV, giving employers access to a broader range of a candidate’s work, thoughts, and achievements.

Personal branding is becoming a core part of professional life, with candidates curating online identities that highlight their skills, values, and industry knowledge. Recruiters often turn to candidates' LinkedIn activity, published articles, or even social media presence to gain a sense of their expertise and engagement in the field.


4. Technology Offers Better, Data-Driven Alternatives

Big data and AI are transforming recruitment. Algorithms now analyse online profiles and even behavioural traits to match candidates with suitable roles. Instead of manually reviewing hundreds of CVs, many recruiters use automated tools to pre-screen applicants based on specific competencies and qualifications.

LinkedIn, for instance, offers “Skills Assessments” that allow candidates to verify their expertise in areas like finance, Excel, or SQL. These certifications offer a more standardised, transparent way of confirming skills than a simple bullet point on a CV.


5. CVs Struggle to Capture Non-Traditional Career Paths

As career paths become less linear, traditional CVs often fail to tell the full story. Today, many people change jobs more frequently, take on freelance roles, or even pursue multiple careers at once. A standard CV can make these varied roles appear fragmented, even if they’re interconnected.

Instead, candidates increasingly use platforms like LinkedIn or personal websites to present more flexible career narratives. These allow for diverse work samples and showcase “side hustles” or freelance projects that might look out of place on a traditional CV.


What Could Replace the CV?


The CV may never fully disappear, but it’s increasingly being supplemented or replaced by formats that are interactive, detailed, and adaptable. Here are a few emerging alternatives:


  • LinkedIn Profiles: Dynamic and interactive, LinkedIn profiles allow for endorsements, recommendations, and multimedia content, providing a richer, more nuanced view of a candidate’s skills.
  • Skills-Based Assessments: Pre-interview tests and online certifications verify skills in real-time, offering more transparent skill validation than self-assessed qualifications.
  • Personal Websites and Portfolios: These allow candidates to showcase their work in depth, especially useful for project-based roles, freelancers, and creatives.
  • Video Introductions or Portfolios: Some recruiters use short video introductions or portfolios to better understand a candidate’s personality and communication skills before interviews.
  • Behavioural Assessments: Predictive behavioural analytics can assess cultural fit and work style, adding a valuable layer to the hiring process.


Conclusion: The CV’s Role in a Changing World


While the CV may not be completely obsolete, it’s clear that a one-page document is no longer sufficient to capture a candidate’s full potential. Rather than relying on a single, static file, companies are increasingly using multi-dimensional assessments, digital portfolios, and real-time data to get a more complete picture of a candidate’s skills, personality, and fit.

Moving beyond the CV represents an opportunity to embrace new tools that provide richer insights and improve decision-making. As the world of work continues to change, it’s likely that the CV will shift from centre stage to become one part of a broader, more holistic hiring strategy. The future of recruitment is dynamic—perhaps it’s time for hiring practices to catch up.

Man in light blue shirt, adjusting dark tie, eyes closed against a gray background.
By Eliot Acton January 28, 2026
There is a lot of confidence right now in finance. AI will fix reporting. AI will speed up forecasting. AI will improve insight. AI will free finance teams up to be more strategic. Some of that will be true. But there is an uncomfortable truth that rarely gets discussed. Most finance teams are not ready for AI. And AI is not the reason why. The illusion many finance leaders are buying into AI has become a convenient shortcut. A way to believe that technology will solve problems that are actually rooted in people, structure and decision making. If the tools are smart enough, the thinking will improve. If the dashboards are better, decisions will follow. If the output is faster, the function will become more strategic. That logic sounds attractive. It is also flawed. AI does not fix weak judgement. It does not fix unclear ownership. It does not fix poor challenge. It does not fix a finance team that lacks confidence or commercial understanding. It simply accelerates whatever already exists. Why AI exposes finance weaknesses rather than solving them In many organisations, finance already produces more information than the business can properly use. More reports have not led to better decisions. More data has not led to clearer strategy. More analysis has not led to better outcomes. AI increases volume, speed and sophistication. But it does not tell you: Which numbers actually matter What trade offs to make When to challenge a decision When to say no Those are human responsibilities. If a finance team struggles to influence decisions today, AI will not suddenly give it a stronger voice tomorrow. The real risk leaders are ignoring The real risk is not that AI replaces finance professionals. The real risk is that it exposes which finance roles never moved beyond production in the first place. As automation removes transactional work, the remaining roles become more exposed. They require: Judgement Commercial awareness Confidence Influence Accountability for decisions Some people step into that space naturally. Others retreat from it. AI does not create that divide. It reveals it. Where most organisations are getting this wrong Many businesses are investing heavily in tools while changing very little about: How finance roles are defined What finance people are hired for How performance is measured Where decision ownership sits So finance teams are asked to be more strategic without being hired, structured or rewarded to do so. That is not transformation. It is expectation inflation. Why hiring matters more than technology right now Two organisations can implement the same AI tools. One gets better decisions. The other gets faster confusion. The difference is not software. It is capability. The businesses seeing real value from AI are: Hiring people who can interpret and challenge outputs Building finance roles around decisions, not reports Developing commercial confidence, not just technical depth Being honest about who can step up and who cannot They understand that AI raises the bar. It does not lower it. The conversation finance leaders need to have The most important AI question for finance is not: What tools should we buy? It is: Do we have the people who can actually use this well?  Because AI does not replace weak finance functions. It makes their weaknesses impossible to hide. And for leaders willing to face that honestly, that is not a threat. It is an opportunity.
By Eliot Acton January 27, 2026
Most finance transformations do not fail because of systems
Tortoise resting in front of rock wall, shaded by leaves.
By Eliot Acton January 27, 2026
Speed has become a badge of honour in recruitment